Table of Contents

The Question

Current Assessment (2025)

  Federal Workforce Purge and Restructuring.

    Mass Layoffs.

    Elon Musk’s Role and AI

    Fiscal Shock: Budget Cuts vs. Tax Windfalls.

    Corporate Tax Breaks.

  Spending Cuts and Social Programs.

  Hardball Geopolitics: New American Expansionism..

    Panama Canal “Takeback”

    Greenland and Beyond.

    Gaza “Peacekeeping” Takeover.

    Alignment with Russia in Ukraine.

  Executive Overreach and Legal Battles.

    Government by Executive Oder.

    Musk’s Role.

    Marginalization of Congress.

  Historical Parallels to Authoritarian Shifts.

    Purges and Power Grabs in Government

    Global Authoritarians.

    Tax Cuts for the Wealthy and Economic Upheaval

    Geopolitical Expansionism and Realignment

Near-Term Impact (Before the 2028 Election)

  Economic Repercussions: Markets and Employment

    Markets and Growth:

    Employment and Inequality.

  Legal and Institutional Challenges.

    Judicial Showdowns.

    Congressional Dynamics.

    State-Level Resistance.

    Civil Service and Institutional Morale.

  Effects on Allies and Global Relations.

    Strained Alliances.

    Diplomatic Isolation.

  Allies’ Specific Reactions.

    Europe (NATO/EU)

    Middle East

    Latin America.

    Russia and China.

  Internal Resistance and Civil Unrest

    Protests and Strikes.

    State and Local Pushback.

    Extremism and Violence.

    Polarization and Public Sentiment

Projections for the U.S. in 2028.

  Democracy and Governance.

  Economic Conditions and Public Services.

    Short-Term Boom, Then Bust

    Persistent Stagflation Risk.

    Continued Growth but Unequal

  Public Sentiment and Political Landscape.

  Opposition Strategies (Next 10 Years)

    Judicial Resistance.

    Congressional and Legislative Action.

    State Governments.

    Federal Workforce “Shadow” Networks.

  Grassroots and Civil Society Efforts.

    Pro-Democracy Coalitions.

    Grassroots Issue Advocacy.

    Media and Information Warfare.

    Grassroots Defense of Institutions.

  International Pressure and Alliances.

    Diplomatic Isolation and Censure.

    Economic Leverage.

    Support for U.S. Civil Society.

    Allies Leading by Example.

    International Legal Action.

  Long-Term Strategies to Restore Democracy and Stability.

    Rebuilding Institutions.

    Accountability and Truth.

    Democratic Reforms.

    Social Healing.

    Constitutional Amendments.

Sources.

The Question

You said:

I want you to think very hard about a big problem.

Since Trump retook the presidency in Jan 2025, he has adopted slash and burn tactics, firing tens of thousands of federal workers and asking all that remain to send an email justifying their job to him. He has Elon Musk and his AI whizz kids handling the responses.

Meanwhile, Republicans in Congress have agreed to slash $2 trillion from the federal budget while giving $4.5 trillion in tax breaks, mainly to corporations. Medicaid will be severely affected.

Internationally, Trump has proposed the US taking control of the Gaza Strip, Greenland and Panama. He has done a 180 degree turn from the previous administration and sided with Russia in the conflict in Ukraine. The US and Russia appear to be carving up the Ukraine to take control of its minerals.

Back in the US, he is ignoring court orders against his plans which he is executing via Executive Orders instead of through Congress (the budget being the exception).

The questions for you are: please research and provide your current assessment of the situation and are there any historical parallels? What is the likely near-term impact, so before the next President elections in 2028. What will the US look like then? Over the short and medium term, so up to the next ten years, what can people who oppose this authoritarian agenda do to bring civility back to civilisation?

 

ChatGPT Said:

I will conduct in-depth research into the current political, economic, and international situation following Trump's return to the presidency in 2025. This will include:

I will get back to you with a detailed report soon.

 

Current Assessment (2025)

Federal Workforce Purge and Restructuring

Mass Layoffs

Elon Musk’s Role and AI

Fiscal Shock: Budget Cuts vs. Tax Windfalls

Corporate Tax Breaks

Spending Cuts and Social Programs

Hardball Geopolitics: New American Expansionism

On the international front, Trump’s second term has upended long-standing U.S. foreign policy – veering into open territorial ambitions and realigning American loyalties in global conflicts. His administration’s moves in early 2025 amount to a dramatic neo-imperialist shift that has stunned allies. Key elements include:

Panama Canal “Takeback”

Greenland and Beyond

Gaza “Peacekeeping” Takeover

Alignment with Russia in Ukraine

Executive Overreach and Legal Battles

Government by Executive Oder

Trump’s aggressive agenda – domestic and foreign – has relied heavily on executive power, often pushing or bypassing legal boundaries. This has led to a number of constitutional clashes and court challenges in 2025, fueling debate over the rule of law. The administration has shown a willingness to override or ignore court orders via Executive Orders (EOs) or simply through non-compliance, raising alarms about a constitutional crisis.

Musk’s Role

Marginalization of Congress

Historical Parallels to Authoritarian Shifts

Trump’s actions in 2025 have invited comparisons to past episodes in U.S. and global history when leaders dramatically expanded power, purged government ranks, or pursued imperial ambitions. While history never repeats exactly, several historical parallels shed light on the current moment:

Purges and Power Grabs in Government

Global Authoritarians

Tax Cuts for the Wealthy and Economic Upheaval

Geopolitical Expansionism and Realignment

Near-Term Impact (Before the 2028 Election)

The dramatic shifts under Trump 47 (his second term) are already reverberating through America’s economy, institutions, and global relationships. Over the next few years leading up to the 2028 election, we can expect significant consequences – some intended, many not. Here’s an outlook on key areas before 2028:

Economic Repercussions: Markets and Employment

Markets and Growth:

Employment and Inequality

Legal and Institutional Challenges

Judicial Showdowns

Congressional Dynamics

State-Level Resistance

Civil Service and Institutional Morale

Effects on Allies and Global Relations

Strained Alliances

Diplomatic Isolation

Allies’ Specific Reactions

Europe (NATO/EU)

Middle East

Latin America

Russia and China

Internal Resistance and Civil Unrest

The rapid political and social changes are provoking significant domestic backlash. Before 2028, the U.S. may experience heightened civil unrest and polarization not seen in decades. Key trends:

Protests and Strikes

State and Local Pushback

Extremism and Violence

Polarization and Public Sentiment

Projections for the U.S. in 2028

Looking ahead to the next presidential election, several scenarios emerge for the state of American democracy, economy, and society in 2028. While unpredictable events could alter the trajectory, we can outline likely conditions if current trends hold through Trump’s term:

Democracy and Governance

By 2028, the U.S. will likely be a democracy under severe strain – but not yet collapsed. Trump’s tenure will have eroded many democratic norms and perhaps some institutional checks, but core features (regular elections, a free albeit embattled press, and a vocal opposition) should still exist.

The critical question is the integrity of the 2028 election itself. Trump’s opponents worry he will not allow a truly free and fair election if he can help it. However, implementing outright authoritarian control over elections nationwide is difficult in the U.S.’ decentralized system.

What is more plausible is continued gerrymandering, voter suppression measures, and manipulation of rules to tilt the playing field. Indeed, by 2028 many GOP-led states have passed stricter voting laws (e.g. requiring specific IDs, limiting mail ballots, purging voter rolls) which could dampen turnout among younger, minority, and anti-Trump voters. Conversely, some blue states have expanded mail voting and pre-registration. We might see an election that is free in some places and constrained in others – raising disputes over legitimacy.

The Justice Department (under loyalists) likely won’t enforce Voting Rights Act provisions diligently, so any suppression issues may go unaddressed federally. Despite these hurdles, the U.S. still has a strong civil society and engaged electorate, so massive fraud or cancellation of elections is highly unlikely – 2028 will happen, but under a cloud of intense partisan distrust. Democracy watchdogs like Freedom House have already downgraded the U.S. rating; by 2028 the U.S. might rank alongside some “backsliding democracies” such as Hungary or Poland in those indices. America could be termed a “competitive authoritarian” regime – where elections occur but the incumbent wields state power to heavily skew the competition (media control, harassing opponents, etc.).

Expect the rule of law to be a central issue. Under Trump, the DOJ has pursued charges against some political adversaries (some state prosecutors who opposed him have faced federal investigations, etc.), which opponents call weaponization of justice. If this continues, by 2028 the precedent of using the levers of justice against rivals may be somewhat normalized (again akin to Hungary or Turkey).

The Supreme Court might have also undergone change: there is speculation Trump could get another appointment if any justice retires or passes away; that could entrench a 7-2 conservative majority that tends to favor executive power or Republican state interests (though note, not all conservative justices are partisan – some might join liberals on rule-of-law cases). The independence of the judiciary is thus another factor – will it hold or be overawed? So far, it’s held in many cases, but by 2028 we’ll know if it’s bent (e.g., if SCOTUS consistently rules for Trump on controversial election or power issues, public perception of it as independent may vanish).

Political culture in 2028 will be hyper-polarized, possibly even more than today (if that’s possible). The notion of bipartisan compromise on big issues is basically gone. Each party and their voters view the other as an existential threat. This is dangerous for democracy’s long-term health, but in the short term it means 2028 will be seen by many as a “last chance” to save the republic (on the opposition side) or to cement the gains (on the Trump side).

There is a risk that if Trump or an anointed successor loses narrowly, they might not accept the result – reminiscent of Trump’s stance in 2020. However, by 2028 even many Republicans (especially in Congress or state offices) may be tired of the chaos and might not go along with an election subversion attempt. It’s a wild card – but one cannot rule out a contested result scenario in 2028 that makes 2020’s aftermath look mild. Preventing that will require overwhelming turnout and clear margins, plus legal safeguards that have hopefully been shored up (note: after 2020, Congress did reform the Electoral Count Act to close loopholes in how electoral votes are counted, which could help avoid some of the January 6th-type manipulation attempts).

In summary, in 2028 American democracy will still stand, but shakily. It will be the issue at stake in the election itself. One could imagine international observers being invited to monitor the election – something more associated with young democracies than the USA, but perhaps necessary to assure legitimacy.

Domestically, there could be widespread training of poll-watchers and lawyers on both sides ready to jump in. The hope among democracy advocates is that 2028 could be a turning point to begin repairing the damage, but that outcome rests entirely on the vote and acceptance of the results.

Economic Conditions and Public Services

By the time of the 2028 election, the economic fallout of Trump’s policies will be more fully apparent. There are a couple of plausible economic scenarios:

Short-Term Boom, Then Bust

Persistent Stagflation Risk

Continued Growth but Unequal

Likely, elements of all three scenarios could mix. Regardless, public services by 2028 will be significantly deteriorated compared to a decade prior. With so many federal staff gone, basic government functions have slowed. For instance, processing of Social Security claims, veterans’ benefits, and passport applications have seen massive backlogs. Agencies like the EPA or FDA, gutted by cuts, struggle to fulfill their missions – we might see more pollution incidents or food safety recalls because oversight was thinned.

The healthcare system, especially for low-income people, will be strained: after years of Medicaid rollbacks, millions will have lost coverage, leading to overcrowded ERs and some preventable deaths – a grim toll that advocacy groups will likely highlight.

Education could suffer too: if Trump closed the Department of Education or block-granted its funds, poorer districts would have felt the pinch, possibly laying off teachers or cutting programs. By 2028 the effects of those cuts on student outcomes (test scores, college attendance) might be emerging, sparking concern about the nation’s human capital future.

Public transportation, scientific research, infrastructure maintenance – all those areas may show signs of neglect due to funding cuts (bridges a bit shakier, fewer new innovations coming out of U.S. labs, etc.). These are subtle but cumulative drags on U.S. quality of life and competitiveness.

On the positive side, inflated defense and security spending might mean the U.S. military and border apparatus are robustly funded – though even within those, mismanagement (due to purging experienced personnel) could reduce effectiveness. And some sectors (like fossil fuels) will flourish with deregulation; by 2028 the U.S. could be producing record oil and gas, for example, but at the cost of forsaking climate goals and possibly suffering more climate-related disasters (hurricanes, wildfires) without adequate federal response.

Public sentiment might then be shifting – by 2028, even some of Trump’s 2024 voters (e.g. farmers hurt by climate events or lack of aid, seniors upset about Medicare bureaucracy issues, etc.) may feel disillusioned.

In all, come 2028, the U.S. economy might be summed up as “doing okay at the top, struggling at the bottom.” Deficits will be towering, setting up hard choices for whoever wins – possibly needing emergency measures to avoid a debt crisis. And public services will be a shell of what they were, with many Americans noticing the government they interact with is less responsive or helpful (a stark realization if, say, a natural disaster hits and FEMA is undercut – another plausible scenario that could shape the narrative before 2028).

Public Sentiment and Political Landscape

By 2028, the American public will have had nearly four years to judge Trump’s return. Public sentiment will likely be extremely polarized (as noted), but also perhaps fatigued. Political fatigue can set in when chaos and conflict are unrelenting. We saw a bit of that in late 2020 when many voters, even some who didn’t love Biden, voted for a return to normalcy.

By 2028, after constant turmoil, a significant slice of voters may yearn for stability and sanity. This could benefit a challenger who promises to restore normalcy and democratic norms (echoes of Warren G. Harding’s “return to normalcy” after WWI and the 1918 pandemic, or Biden’s “soul of the nation” appeal). We can expect campaigns to explicitly frame it this way: “Are you better off and prouder of your country than you were four years ago?” – if many say no, the incumbent coalition is in trouble.

The political landscape might also see new realignments. Trump’s dominance of the GOP has solidified the Republican Party as a populist-nationalist party with a working-class base (particularly non-college educated whites, but also increasing numbers of conservative Hispanics).

The Democratic Party, in opposition, has become the big-tent for everyone from progressives to former moderate Republicans horrified by Trump. By 2028, that Democratic coalition may be both very broad and somewhat uneasy – they’ll be united by a desire to oust Trumpism, but once in power could have internal splits. Regardless, 2028 is shaping up to be less about traditional left-right policy divides and more a pro- or anti-authoritarian referendum. Polls show democracy, corruption, and rights ranking as top issues alongside the economy for voters – a notable change from the usual emphasis solely on economic matters.

We might also see third-party or independent efforts if people are dissatisfied with both choices. For instance, some anti-Trump conservatives might run a third-party candidate if they feel the Democrats go too far left. Or vice versa, some on the left might be impatient if the Democratic candidate is too centrist. However, given the stakes, 2028 may force most voters into a binary choice – minor parties could have less appeal when democracy itself is on the line. If one side or the other doesn’t fully trust the process, they might engage in self-help: e.g. more citizen activism around election protection, poll watching, etc., which could feed tension but also ensure engagement.

Public sentiment by late 2027 might show majority exhaustion with Trump’s confrontational style. Approval ratings in second terms often dip (Reagan Iran-Contra, Bush Katrina/Iraq), so Trump could be quite unpopular overall by 2028 even if his core base remains adoring. Signs include how independents lean – likely many have swung against if they see chaos outweighing any benefit.

Meanwhile, Trump’s base, while loyal, might shrink due to attrition (some supporters, especially older ones, may no longer be around or may moderate as conditions hit them). But we cannot underestimate the cult of personality – Trump’s rallies in 2028 will still draw fervent crowds, and he or his designated successor will cast the election as a battle for America’s survival against “socialists and globalists.” That messaging keeps the base turnout high.

One more aspect: media and information. By 2028, the media landscape might be even more siloed. Trump has favored friendly outlets and threatened critical ones. Perhaps he’ll succeed in weakening independent media a bit (maybe through harassment via lawsuits, regulatory pressure on broadcasters, etc.). Yet alternative channels (internet, social media, independent journalists) will still ensure information flows.

The question is, will misinformation cloud people’s understanding? It likely will – deepfakes, propaganda on social networks, and partisan echo chambers will be in overdrive in 2028. The electorate will need to sift truth from spin about Trump’s record (e.g. is the economy really strong or not? Has democracy really eroded or is that just opposition talking points?). The battle for narrative will be intense. Civil society groups and perhaps bipartisan coalitions might mount campaigns to promote factual discourse and counter disinformation, recognizing that a healthy democracy requires some shared reality.

In summary, approaching 2028, America stands at a crossroads: either reaffirm democracy or cement a new authoritarian tilt. The state of the union then will be one of heightened political engagement but also fear – fear on one side that democracy may end if Trumpism continues, and fear on the other side that “their America” will be lost if Trumpism is defeated. It’s a recipe for an emotionally charged, high-turnout election likely setting records. The hope is that the institutions hold long enough to allow that election to truly reflect the people’s will, and that the loser (whoever it is) accepts the outcome to allow the country to move forward.

Opposition Strategies (Next 10 Years)

In the face of Trump’s authoritarian-leaning governance, a wide array of actors – from institutions to grassroots groups and international allies – are mobilizing to defend democratic norms and plan for the long term. Opposition strategies can be viewed in short-term (while Trump is in power) and medium-term (the coming decade) horizons:

Judicial Resistance

Congressional and Legislative Action

State Governments

Federal Workforce “Shadow” Networks

Grassroots and Civil Society Efforts

Pro-Democracy Coalitions

Grassroots Issue Advocacy

Media and Information Warfare

Grassroots Defense of Institutions

International Pressure and Alliances

America’s allies and international institutions, while limited in direct influence over U.S. internal affairs, do have strategies to apply pressure and incentivize a return to democratic norms:

Diplomatic Isolation and Censure

Economic Leverage

Support for U.S. Civil Society

Allies Leading by Example

International Legal Action

In summary, while allies cannot directly “fix” American democracy, they can create an external environment that isolates the Trump regime and amplifies the voices of Americans seeking a return to liberal democracy.

Over a 10-year span, assuming Trumpism doesn’t permanently alter the world order, allies will be ready to welcome the U.S. back into the fold of democracies – much as they did after periods when U.S. policy diverged (like after the Iraq War tensions). Their strategy is a mix of pressure and patience, trying to minimize damage in the interim (e.g., Europe taking the lead on Ukraine to ensure Putin doesn’t win outright, so that issue is easier to resolve once U.S. policy shifts back).

Long-Term Strategies to Restore Democracy and Stability

Finally, thinking beyond the Trump era (which by 2035 will presumably be over, given constitutional term limits and generational change), what are the strategies to repair and strengthen American democracy and social stability in the 10-year horizon? Assuming pro-democracy forces regain influence, they will have a heavy to-do list:

Rebuilding Institutions

After Trump, a priority will be to re-staff and rebuild federal institutions that were hollowed out. This means recruiting talented civil servants – possibly even offering incentives for those who left to return – and reconstructing agencies’ missions. There may be discussion of how to prevent another mass purge: perhaps new laws that give civil servants more protections or ensure a more orderly transition process.

The concept of a professional bureaucracy needs recommitment. Reforms could include modernizing the civil service (making it attractive to young talent) while safeguarding merit principles. Similarly, diplomatic corps, intelligence agencies, and others will need rebuilding of trust and capacity. The State Department, for example, lost many senior diplomats; a long-term strategy is to train a new generation and restore U.S. diplomatic credibility.

Accountability and Truth

Many argue that to truly move forward, the country must reckon with what happened. This could take the form of a Truth Commission or a series of congressional investigations that lay bare any abuses of power during Trump’s tenure. The goal would be a historical record to educate future generations and to provide a sense of justice.

For instance, if evidence emerges of illegal orders or corruption, those responsible (even up to Trump) might face legal consequences – though that must be balanced against fears of perpetuating partisan revenge cycles. Perhaps a South Africa-style truth and reconciliation approach could be considered: offering leniency in exchange for full confession of wrongdoing and an apology, to get the truth out.

Over 10 years, ensuring accountability is tricky but important; done fairly, it could deter future would-be authoritarians. Failing to do so might normalize those behaviors.

Democratic Reforms

Structural reforms might be pursued to strengthen democracy’s resilience. Some ideas frequently discussed:

These reforms, many of which have public support, would aim to future-proof the system against democratic erosion. However, passing them requires political agreement – if Democrats control the Presidency and Congress post-Trump, they may push a broad pro-democracy package; Republicans might oppose if they feel it disadvantages them. Yet, it’s conceivable that after a near-miss with authoritarianism, a coalition of patriots from both parties might emerge to implement some safeguards, recognizing the danger of not acting.

Social Healing

A less tangible but vital long-term strategy is healing the social fabric. This involves addressing the root causes of the populist backlash: economic inequality, cultural anxiety, information silos. Long-term stability requires bridging the divides that Trump exploited. This could mean significant investment in education (particularly civic education, media literacy, critical thinking) so the next generation is less susceptible to demagogues.

It could also mean economic policies that reduce inequality and give disaffected working-class communities hope – such as job programs in deindustrialized regions, healthcare and opioid crisis solutions, etc. If people feel less economically or socially left-behind, the appeal of authoritarian populism may wane. Racial reconciliation is another piece – Trump’s era exacerbated racial tensions; a long-term project would be recommitting to racial justice and inclusion in a way that unites rather than divides (no easy task, but dialogues and equitable policies can help).

Civil society can lead many of these healing initiatives: interfaith groups bringing different communities together, cultural exchanges between urban and rural populations, and so forth. Over a decade, changing hearts and minds is slow, but not impossible. The 2020s are a proving ground; if America can weather this storm and enact thoughtful reforms, it could enter the 2030s with a revitalized democracy. Some optimists even say this trial could trigger a new era of democratic renewal, much like the Progressive Era reformed Gilded Age excesses or the post-Watergate era reformed government ethics.

In the international context, a restored U.S. democracy would strengthen the global democratic alliance again, and many of the international pressures will relent. Allies would drop any sanctions or isolation and eagerly cooperate with a U.S. that is back to championing democratic values. The damage to credibility will take time to fully repair – the world will remember that American democracy proved vulnerable – but consistent commitment over years can rebuild trust.

Constitutional Amendments

In the very long term, some scholars suggest amendments may be necessary. For example, a possible amendment to clarify limits on presidential power (like making it explicit a president can be indicted or must comply with subpoenas), or an amendment to reform the electoral college or Supreme Court tenure (18-year term limits have been proposed) to reduce partisan crises.

Amending the U.S. Constitution is extremely difficult, but if enough national consensus forms that the Trump era exposed fatal flaws, it might be possible. At minimum, state legislatures and Congress might seriously debate such amendments in the coming years – even if they fail, the debate itself educates the public on these issues.

In conclusion, the opposition’s short and medium-term strategy is a multifront effort: contain and mitigate in the present, and prepare the blueprint for a democratic revival in the future. It’s a daunting challenge – essentially attempting to undo an authoritarian pivot and inoculate the nation against its recurrence.

The resolve of American democratic institutions and the public will be tested, but history shows the U.S. has weathered severe trials (Civil War, Nixon’s abuses, etc.) and later enacted reforms to become stronger. The next 10 years will determine if that pattern holds true once more. Each action – in courts, in Congress, in the streets, and at the ballot box – will shape whether the American republic emerges weakened or renewed after this tumultuous chapter.

Sources

Reuters, Thousands fired as Trump, Musk purge federal workers (Thousands fired in US government as Trump, Musk purge federal workers | Reuters) (Thousands fired in US government as Trump, Musk purge federal workers | Reuters); Reuters, Musk ultimatum spurs confusion among workers (Musk's new ultimatum spurs fresh confusion among US government workers | Reuters); Reuters, Trump vows to take back Panama Canal (Trump vows to take back Panama Canal, talks of 'Manifest Destiny' in space | Reuters) (Trump vows to take back Panama Canal, talks of 'Manifest Destiny' in space | Reuters); The Defense Post (Israel's Netanyahu Says Trump Plan for Gaza 'Revolutionary') (Israel's Netanyahu Says Trump Plan for Gaza 'Revolutionary'); Medill News Service (White House underscores Trump’s proposal for U.S. control of Gaza, backpedals on permanently displacing Palestinians - Medill on the Hill) (White House underscores Trump’s proposal for U.S. control of Gaza, backpedals on permanently displacing Palestinians - Medill on the Hill); Reuters, Judge orders US to unfreeze aid (Judge again orders US to unfreeze foreign aid, stops short of contempt | Reuters) (Judge again orders US to unfreeze foreign aid, stops short of contempt | Reuters); Brookings (Kamarck) (The fallout from DOGE's approach to government reform) (The fallout from DOGE's approach to government reform); ProPublica (To Pay for Trump Tax Cuts, House GOP Could Slash Benefits for Poor, Working Class — ProPublica) (To Pay for Trump Tax Cuts, House GOP Could Slash Benefits for Poor, Working Class — ProPublica); Georgetown CCF (Project 2025 Blueprint Also Includes Draconian Cuts to Medicaid – Center For Children and Families); KFF Health News ( Trump Froze Out Project 2025 in His Campaign. Now Its Blueprint Is His Health Care Playbook. - KFF Health News ) ( Trump Froze Out Project 2025 in His Campaign. Now Its Blueprint Is His Health Care Playbook. - KFF Health News ); Brookings (Kansas) (The Kansas tax cut experiment) (The Kansas tax cut experiment); Federal Judicial Center (History) (Executive Enforcement of Judicial Orders | Federal Judicial Center); Wikipedia (Turkey purge) (Purges in Turkey following the 2016 Turkish coup attempt - Wikipedia); Wikipedia (Great Purge) (Great Purge - Wikipedia); Britannica (Munich Agreement) (Munich Agreement | Definition, Summary, & Significance - Britannica).